What Empirical Health customers say
They have a credible story around health data, summaries, and clinician review, but the newest feedback makes basic reliability their largest weakness. Your clearest opening is a focused experience that connects devices correctly, explains readings in context, and handles labs, appointments, and billing plainly. Avoid broad diagnostic promises and show exactly how your interpretation differs from raw wearable or lab data.
- Researched
- 29 August 2026
- Site
- empirical.health
- Sources
- 3 of 9 answered
- 0
- ads found
- 54
- reviews found
- 3
- sources read
- 2.50
- review rating
Empirical reviews, read · 54 of 54 read one by one · 2026-08-29T18:00:31.179Z
Their strongest proof points are broad health data, readable summaries, and access to clinicians. The main competitive opening is reliability: users repeatedly report broken device connections, lag, missing results, weak explanations, and confusing lab or subscription experiences. You can win by making a narrower promise, showing data provenance and interpretation limits, and making support and cancellation clear.
- 54
- reviews in the window
- 2.52
- average rating
- 59%
- one or two stars
- 7%
- answered by the brand
- 0
- day window
- none
- carry an English text
Rating
Source
54 of 54 reviews · fetched 2026-08-29 · first run, nothing to compare against
Good information,buggy app
It gathers a lot of good data if you go full on and get all the bio markers filled in. The app itself though is buggy and sometimes doesn’t register when touched, or takes forever to load the pages. You update the to do’s and the numbers don’t change. If the to do’s are for specific tasks you can’t complete, then why add it to the top. I feel they have halfway finished the app and walked away. Get better devs to make the app fully functional.
Seems inaccurate
While the info from the bloodwork on different bio markers is cool, all the other info seems really inaccurate. It doesn’t connect to an oura ring but only an Apple Watch and it getting my data all wrong and making my numbers off as well. It’s just a robot, so there’s no nuance. It’s a no from me.
Bad interface - sales focused
They are just selling labs. The interface is clunky and it show no useful insights. Integration to My Chart Labs is terrible. Integration to Apple health and Apple Watch is also truly Total junk.
Junk - Terrible app and support is even worse
I have been using the free version for more than 3 months. Could never get my Apple Watch fully functional, despite the (half-hearted [no pun intended]) terrible support interactions, even when the team knew I was interested in upgrading to the paid service(s) if I could fully set up the app. Example: the app says “you were in bed for 3 hours and 55 minutes and slept 7 hours and 19 minutes,” even though Apple Health, AutoSleep, Oura, and Whoop report credible values. FYI - I transitioned to this app to replace the Cardiogram app (which actually worked quite well) when the developer discontinued it.
Go back to the old style
Liked it better last week
There are better
Run down lab at bio reference, inscrutable interface in app to download results and no support. Basically sucks.
Not Worth the Spend.
Stick with the Apple Health app. I have found this app extremely simplistic and providing no more data points than Apple Health. Save your money.
No Go for POTS
Downloaded for POTS and CHOP protocol but without the ability to customize my base pace and other heart rate zones, my bradycardia prevents my ability to reach those zones. I unsubscribed and deleted
Research receiptSources, retention and creditsHide details
What this run read
11 credits spent
Ad copy and review text are quoted from the linked public pages.
This is a public page on kamplyapp.com. It stays up until its owner takes it down.
