Skip to content
Kamply

Competitor decision brief

Visit sync.so

What sync. labs customers say

Sync.so's only fetched review centers on unclear subscription coverage, extra project charges, and billing after account deletion. You can differentiate with explicit usage boundaries, complete project-cost examples, and verifiable cancellation controls. Treat billing transparency as a switching reason because this complaint ended in churn.

Researched
29 August 2026
Sources
1 of 9 answered
0
ads found
1
review found
1
sources read
1.00
review rating

Sync reviews, read · 1 of 1 read one by one · 2026-08-29T16:14:07.044Z

This 1-review sample points to a serious billing-trust problem around subscription coverage, project charges, and post-cancellation billing. Use clear usage examples, cancellation confirmation, and visible billing controls to make your offer safer than theirs. The row is about Sync.so and was included.

1
reviews in the window
1.00
average rating
100%
one or two stars
0%
answered by the brand
0
day window
none
carry an English text

Rating

Source

1 of 1 reviews · fetched 2026-08-29 · first run, nothing to compare against

★☆☆☆☆2026-05-31

Misleading Pricing and Bad Experience

I had a very disappointing experience with Sync.so. They advertise a subscription plan, but after subscribing I discovered that I was still being charged for individual projects. The pricing structure is confusing and feels misleading. I expected the subscription to cover my usage, but instead I was asked to pay again for each project. This was not clear during the signup process. Because of this experience, I deleted my account. What is even more frustrating is that charges continued to appear on my bank card after I had already removed my account. This has caused a lot of concern and inconvenience. I feel that customers deserve much more transparency about costs and billing. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend this service and would advise others to carefully review all charges before signing up.

TrustpilotMAprice-and-billing
Research receiptSources, retention and credits

What this run read

  • Meta Ad Librarynot read
  • LinkedIn Ad Librarynothing found
  • Google Ads Transparencynothing found
  • TikTok Ad Librarynot read
  • App Storenot read
  • Trustpilot1
  • G2not read
  • Capterranot read
  • Google Playnot read

11 credits spent

Ad copy and review text are quoted from the linked public pages.

This is a public page on kamplyapp.com. It stays up until its owner takes it down.

Run this on your own competitor

Paste a competitor's website and Kamply reads its live ads and its public reviews, then writes the brief. Sign in with Google, 20 runs a day, every source named.

More in B2B software

  • Precip

    B2B software

    35 ads120 reviews29 August 2026

  • Chatbase

    B2B software

    40 ads100 reviews29 August 2026

  • Conveo

    B2B software

    83 ads10 reviews29 August 2026

  • VetRec

    B2B software

    64 ads21 reviews29 August 2026

  • Retellai

    B2B software

    32 ads50 reviews29 August 2026

  • Artisan

    B2B software

    25 ads50 reviews29 August 2026

Every B2B software report