What Andy customers say
They currently combine a 15-minute OASIS claim with peer validation from a home health RN. Their strongest review evidence points to less charting after a full pay-per-visit schedule, while their other review gives only general developer praise. You should make your workflow, proof of accuracy, and support actions more specific than their broad testimonial-led message.
- Researched
- 29 August 2026
- Site
- with-andy.com
- Ads read in
- US
- Sources
- 2 of 9 answered
- 1
- ad found
- 2
- reviews found
- 2
- sources read
- 5.00
- review rating
Andy reviews, read · 2 of 2 read one by one · 2026-08-29T16:22:04.863Z
Both of the 2 reviews are positive, but only 1 explains a concrete benefit: less charting after a full pay-per-visit schedule. You can compete by making the work reduction measurable and by showing how your team responds to users, while treating the short developer praise as weak evidence.
- 2
- reviews in the window
- 5.00
- average rating
- 0%
- one or two stars
- 0%
- answered by the brand
- 0
- day window
- none
- carry an English text
Rating
Source
2 of 2 reviews · fetched 2026-08-29 · first run, nothing to compare against
Kevin
This is a game changer if you do pay per visit. You can pack your schedule full and still not have any charting to do when you get home. Big fan!
Great app!
I really like the developers
Research receiptSources, retention and creditsHide details
What this run read
14 credits spent
Ad copy and review text are quoted from the linked public pages.
This is a public page on kamplyapp.com. It stays up until its owner takes it down.
.png){kind=small}
