Competitor decision brief
What 222 customers say
Their strongest proof is that people enjoy the events and meet new friends when access works, but the experience is undermined by waitlists, unclear charges, weak communication, and safety complaints. You can attack the gap between the promise and the delivered experience with upfront eligibility, transparent billing, reliable event details, and visible human support. Their 4 newest ad records are unreadable, so customer complaints are the clearer source of competitive direction.
- Researched
- 28 August 2026
- Site
- 222.place
- Ads read in
- US
- Sources
- 3 of 9 answered
- 4
- ads found
- 105
- reviews found
- 3
- sources read
- Not rated
- review rating
222 reviews, read · 60 of 105 read one by one · 2026-08-28T20:42:00.658Z
The 60 newest reviews show a sharp split: people praise the social experiences and matching when they get in, while many others report surprise charges, waitlists, poor communication, and safety concerns. The strongest opening for you is a service with clear eligibility, predictable attendance, upfront pricing, and a human path to help. The 4 newest ad records are unreadable, so they are set aside from the review-led verdict rather than used to infer their message.
- 105
- reviews in the window
- 3.32
- average rating
- 38%
- one or two stars
- 0%
- answered by the brand
- 0
- day window
- none
- carry an English text
Rating
Source
Country
105 of 105 reviews · fetched 2026-08-28 · first run, nothing to compare against
SCAM!!
Do NOT get this app, they charge $22 for membership, steal your info, won’t let you cancel membership, and charge ANOTHER $22 for cancelation. SCAM!!! be warned
Welcome to AI
I rarely review anything but in this case it’s a must! It’s true the curations are repetitive, expensive & the ppl/locations are corporate-like. What surprised me, no one mentioned that you NEVER connect to a human. It’s all AI driven. They will pretend they are “100% human”, the operative word choice. They are not. Not being able to connect with your guest = a long term disaster in the making. I would have cont’ on, if actual humans were answering questions. I asked what is your name, generic replies popped up. This company is “text obsessed”. The APP is beyond confusing and not user friendly. Curating events for ppl to meet/connect from a company that doesn’t connect. 😳
AI MADAME?
No thanks, this app violates human rights & sets you up with toxic people. It promotes UNSAFE behavior & rewards addiction
Still in beta TBH
Overall a great experience. Some kinks need to be worked out like changing people’s assigned locations last minute. That seems like an amateur thing that should have been worked out before shipping final version. Sucks to have plans in place for travel and things shift last minute. The people and the hangs are good, it’s a small enough community that if you’re goal is to find some longer term friendships that is possible
The best
This app was curated so meticulously and the algorithm is extremely plausible. I’ve met so many amazing people through this app and I hope nothing changes.
Go for it
Met some absolutely great people here and great experiences
Deceptive!!
I strongly caution anyone considering using the 222 app because of what I found to be extremely deceptive practices. The app forces you to invite 5–6 people from your contacts before you can proceed, and it does not allow duplicate invites. What makes this especially concerning is that the app then sends those people invitations for events that you never actually agreed to or planned. As the user, these events are presented to you more like suggestions or ideas for potential “dates.” However, the person you invite receives what appears to be an actual curated invitation and itinerary for an event that you, the supposed inviter, may know absolutely nothing about. The language used in the invitation is also misleading because it makes it seem as though you personally curated or selected the experience for your friend, when that is not what happened. It gets worse when the person you invited is then asked to pay $22.22 as a “curation” fee for this supposed experience. So from their perspective, it looks like you intentionally invited them to an event, helped curate the plans, and are now expecting them to pay a fee to participate—when in reality, you may not even know what event they were invited to. There is a major difference between asking users to invite friends to join an app and using someone’s name to send what appears to be a personalized event invitation without making it completely clear to the user what is being sent on their behalf. The entire process felt incredibly misleading and deceptive, both to me as the user and to the people receiving the invitations. Users should be clearly shown exactly what will be sent to their contacts, what event is being proposed, and that the recipient will be asked to pay $22.22 BEFORE the invitation is sent. I would not have knowingly agreed to send invitations like this to my friends.
Frustrating
I paid a subscription fee before I was locked out of the app until I invited 5 people. Super embarrassing. They need to add location to the description because I’m just requesting invite after invite just to see the location is an hour away from me on a week night. I spent over a month trying to give this a chance but it’s just too much hassle.
Research receiptSources, retention and creditsHide details
What this run read
10 credits spent
Ad copy and review text are quoted from the linked public pages.
This is a public page on kamplyapp.com. It stays up until its owner takes it down.